|
VAN/LA
Nov 9, 2011 21:58:42 GMT -7
Post by steve1107 on Nov 9, 2011 21:58:42 GMT -7
TO VAN: David Krecji (74) Leland Irving (80) Philip Johnson (95)
TO LA: Michael Grabner (73)
Agreed!
with grabbing Mike Lee off waivers and having Rabanser almost ready in the minors Irving was ok to move....David Krecji became a sucker of not enough rosters spots...with Jordan Caron joining the team next year and picking up Chubykin and Novotny off waivers...Philip Johnson although gonna be a good very consistant prospect just didnt fit in with his one way play... Grabner will become a great part of this team...
Thanks!
|
|
|
VAN/LA
Nov 9, 2011 22:00:25 GMT -7
Post by leafsgm?VancoverGm on Nov 9, 2011 22:00:25 GMT -7
Comfirms adding things to have team some Depth and A Bit Younger
|
|
|
VAN/LA
Nov 10, 2011 14:14:43 GMT -7
Post by minnesotagm on Nov 10, 2011 14:14:43 GMT -7
I'm not sure if I can agree to this trade, Grabner is one of the top players for the Canucks and the players returning are not close to compare to him overall... Why another goalie is needed in Vancouver when there are three better ones.. and I saw that a $3 Million offer was tried... so for low cap, I checked and Grabner signed in my sim a $3.25 with max bonus at 5 years with a TO on top of it all..
|
|
|
VAN/LA
Nov 11, 2011 6:46:39 GMT -7
Post by Jesse (Avs) on Nov 11, 2011 6:46:39 GMT -7
I'm gonna disagree to this one as well, for a lot of the same reasons. Vancouver has 3 Goalies under contract, and for Vancouver to add a 4th goalie who is just a backup doesnt make sense to lose Grabner for.
Johnson and Krejci are good depth, but on an ageing team trading your best cost-to-age (arguably) winger for depth is not a good move for Vancouver.
|
|
|
Post by LongIsland on Nov 11, 2011 7:52:20 GMT -7
I concur. Rejected.
|
|
|
VAN/LA
Nov 11, 2011 11:31:17 GMT -7
Post by leafsgm?VancoverGm on Nov 11, 2011 11:31:17 GMT -7
Not a Problem Guys at All I know you all Would reject It
|
|
|
VAN/LA
Nov 11, 2011 11:44:20 GMT -7
Post by Jesse (Avs) on Nov 11, 2011 11:44:20 GMT -7
Not a Problem Guys at All I know you all Would reject It If that's the case, you might want to either re-work those types of trades or just avoid them altogether. If you know its not gonna pass, there's probably a good enough reason for it.
|
|