|
Post by flamesgm on Dec 12, 2011 13:06:13 GMT -7
To Calgary: Brock Nelson (con 78)
To Winnipeg: Corey Trivino (con 73)
I got more defensive player which is need for the role that he is going to play for me.
|
|
|
Post by LongIsland on Dec 12, 2011 14:02:33 GMT -7
In my opinion, this trade is WAY off...
Rejected
|
|
|
Post by flamesgm on Dec 12, 2011 14:03:57 GMT -7
What if I add 4th 2016 to this?
|
|
|
Post by LongIsland on Dec 12, 2011 16:40:53 GMT -7
Wait to hear from other people but I would reject the 4th too.
|
|
|
Post by minnesotagm on Dec 12, 2011 17:38:00 GMT -7
I will unfortunately have to reject this as well Brock Nelson is above Trivino in most stats.... myself to accept this trade, it would have to at least include nothing less then a 3rd rounder included and the confirmation of the other party to explain the trade as well.
|
|
|
Post by DevilsGM/OilersGM on Dec 12, 2011 17:44:31 GMT -7
i knew it wasnt gonna pass to begin with but flames decided to see if it would or not
|
|
|
Post by flamesgm on Dec 12, 2011 22:25:18 GMT -7
Ok I can add 3rd 2017 to this....
so the trade would be:
To Calgary: Brock Nelson (con 78)
To Winnipeg: Corey Trivino (con 73) 3rd 2017
|
|
|
Post by minnesotagm on Dec 12, 2011 23:48:11 GMT -7
I would say approve-able, but with the commish saying he thought it wouldn't even go through.. its really based if he would want this trade to go through for Winnipeg's GMless team....
|
|
|
Post by LongIsland on Dec 13, 2011 8:26:13 GMT -7
A 3rd doesn't do it for me. Winnipeg looses a solid hitter and doesn't get anything back for him. I have to reject this as well.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse (Avs) on Dec 13, 2011 8:43:54 GMT -7
Ill reject as well. Again, if you guys know it wont get approved beforehand, theres no sense in testing it. Like isles said, winnipeg lose this guy and dont really need to
|
|